Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Able Time, Inc., 06-56033

In an suit involving allegedly counterfeit watches seized by Customs and the resulting civil penalties imposed, grant of summary judgment for defendant is reversed and remanded where: 1) the Tariff Act does not contain an identity of goods or services requirement; and 2) as a matter of law, goods imported by defendant could not be "merchandise bearing a counterfeit mark" under 19 U.S.C. section 1526(e) because the owner of the trademark in question did not at the time make the type of goods imported by defendant.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/15/2008
  • Decided 09/25/2008
  • Published 09/25/2008

Judges

  • CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:, Before:  STEPHEN S. TROTT, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Charles E. Mullins (argued), United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, and Anthony Steinmeyer, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Elon A. Pollack (argued), Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, Los Angeles, CA, and Phyllis G. Pollack, Law Offices of Phyllis G. Pollack, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee Able Time, Inc.
Copied to clipboard