United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Able Time, Inc., 06-56033
In an suit involving allegedly counterfeit watches seized by Customs and the resulting civil penalties imposed, grant of summary judgment for defendant is reversed and remanded where: 1) the Tariff Act does not contain an identity of goods or services requirement; and 2) as a matter of law, goods imported by defendant could not be "merchandise bearing a counterfeit mark" under 19 U.S.C. section 1526(e) because the owner of the trademark in question did not at the time make the type of goods imported by defendant.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/15/2008
- Decided 09/25/2008
- Published 09/25/2008
Judges
- CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:, Before: STEPHEN S. TROTT, RICHARD R. CLIFTON, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Charles E. Mullins (argued), United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD, and Anthony Steinmeyer, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. for the plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Elon A. Pollack (argued), Stein Shostak Shostak Pollack & O'Hara, Los Angeles, CA, and Phyllis G. Pollack, Law Offices of Phyllis G. Pollack, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee Able Time, Inc.