United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Daniels, 07-50242
Sentence for possessing child pornography is affirmed in part and vacated and remanded in part where: 1) a lifetime term of supervised release agreed to by defendant in his plea agreement was reasonable; 2) remand was required to determine whether a written condition of release requiring physiological testing conflicted with an oral pronouncement requiring psychological testing; and 3) other terms of the supervised release agreement were reasonable.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/06/2008
- Decided 08/29/2008
- Published 08/29/2008
Judges
- WALLACE, Circuit Judge:, Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, RONALD M. GOULD, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Sean K. Kennedy, Federal Public Defender, and Kathryn A. Young, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Thomas P. O'Brien, United States Attorney, Christine C. Ewell and Joseph N. Akrotirianakis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.