United States Ninth Circuit

ResetAA Font size: Print

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. M&A W. Inc., 06-15165

In an SEC enforcement action arising from the activities of a company described as a "sham incubator for startup companies", summary judgment ruling against defendant is affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part where: 1) the district court correctly found that defendant was an underwriter under section 2(11) of the Securities Act of 1933, and therefore not exempt from the the Act's registration requirements; 2) it did not err in ordering that defendant disgorge all profits, with interest, he obtained from certain transactions; but 3) genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment as to the imposition of certain civil sanctions.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/06/2007
  • Submitted 11/06/2007
  • Decided 08/12/2008
  • Published 08/12/2008

Judges

  • Before:  SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RICHARD C. TALLMAN, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Irving M. Einhorn and Patricia G. Bell, Law Offices of Irving M. Einhorn, for the appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Brian G. Cartwright, General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, Hope Hall Augustini, Senior Litigation Counsel, Tracey A. Hardin, Senior Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, for the appellee.

FindLaw Career Center

    Select a Job Title


      Post a Job  |  Careers Home

    View More