United States Ninth Circuit
Houston v. Schomig, 06-15523
Denial of habeas relief from petitioner's conviction for conspiracy to commit murder, attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon, and discharging a firearm out of a motor vehicle is affirmed in part and vacated in part where: 1) a trial court's denial of his motion to continue the trial did not violate the Sixth Amendment, and a state appellate court's rejection of such claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, federal law; but 2) a remand was required for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether his right to conflict-free counsel was violated.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/14/2008
- Decided 07/22/2008
- Published 07/22/2008
Judges
- Before: WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR., MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges, and STEPHEN G. LARSON, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Anne R. Traum, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Rene L. Hulse, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, for the respondent-appellee.