United States Ninth Circuit

In an antitrust action challenging a marketing agreement between the booksellers Amazon.com and Borders, dismissal of the action is affirmed where plaintiff lacked standing because he did not show that he ever purchased an item for a higher price than he would have paid had there been no marketing agreement, and thus he had suffered no injury-in-fact.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/08/2007
• Decided 05/27/2008
• Published 05/27/2008

Judges

• SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:, Before:  MARY M. SCHROEDER, JAY S. BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Roy A. Katriel, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joel Sanders, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Amazon.com., Reginald Steer, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Borders Group.