Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


Levine v. City of Alameda, 06-15480, 06-15481

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action brought by a city property manager against defendants-city and city manager alleging a due process violation stemming from his lay off, partial summary judgment for plaintiff and defendants is affirmed where the district court did not err in finding that: 1) plaintiff's procedural due process rights were violated and that he was entitled to a full evidentiary hearing before a neutral third-party; and 2) the city manager was not personally liable based on qualified immunity and the city was not liable as a municipality.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/16/2008
  • Decided 05/13/2008
  • Published 05/13/2008

Judges

  • HUG, Circuit Judge:, Before:  PROCTER HUG, JR., MARY M. SCHROEDER, and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Roger A. Carnagey, Oakland, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee., Linda A. Tripoli, Tiburon, CA, for the defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.
Copied to clipboard