United States Ninth Circuit
Woods v. Carey, 05-55302
In habeas proceedings arising after petitioner was convicted of second degree murder and unlawful use of a firearm, dismissal of the habeas petition as barred as successive under 28 U.S.C. section 2244(b)is vacated and remanded with instructions that the district court construe petitioner's pro se petition as a motion to amend the habeas petition that was still pending before the district court at the time this new petition was filed.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/12/2008
- Published 05/12/2008
Judges
- D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:, Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, HARRY PREGERSON, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kurt David Hermansen, Law Office of Kurt David Hermansen, San Diego, CA, for the petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Heather Bushman, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for the respondent.