United States Ninth Circuit
Rose v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 05-56850
In a California Unfair Competition Law action brought on behalf of an ostensible class of California holders of credit cards issued by Chase, arising from charges and fees incurred by plaintiffs in cashing "convenience checks" sent by Chase, judgment on the pleadings for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the National Bank Act preempts the disclosure requirements of Cal. Civ. Code 1748.9, insofar as those requirements apply to national banks; and 2) other claims were preempted by the NBA and applicable regulations, as well.
Appellate Information
- Argued 08/08/2007
- Decided 01/23/2008
- Published 01/23/2008
Judges
- BAER, Senior District Judge:, Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, and HAROLD BAER, JR., Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jeffrey Wilens, Lakeshore Law Center, Yorba Linda, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Laurence J. Hutt, Howard N. Cayne, Nancy L. Perkins, Arnold & Porter, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee.