United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Saeteurn, 06-10401
A sentencing judge is not required to resolve disputes regarding facts recited in a Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), when those facts do not affect the term of imprisonment imposed, but may affect how the sentence is served, including a possible early release from prison.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/11/2007
- Decided 10/15/2007
- Published 10/15/2007
Judges
- BEA, Circuit Judge:, Before: HAWKINS, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Daniel J. Broderick, Federal Defender, Timothy Zindel, Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, CA, for the defendant-appellant., McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, Anne E. Pings, Kyle Riordan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.