Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


Ryman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 06-35630

In a suit brought under the Oregon Family Leave Act (OFLA) against Sears by an employee who was terminated for excessive absences, summary judgment for Sears is affirmed where: 1) although the district court erred in not applying relevant precedent from a state appellate court, as there was no evidence that the Oregon Supreme Court would have decided the OFLA issue differently; nevertheless, 2) affirmance was proper on the grounds that the record in this case did not contain any evidence that Sears violated OFLA.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/12/2007
  • Published 10/12/2007

Judges

  • SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:, Before: FERDINAND F. FERNANDEZ, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Keith D. Karnes, Olsen, Olsen & Daines, and Jason C. McBride, Salem, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael T. Garone and Jean Ohman Back, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR, for the defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard