United States Ninth Circuit
Bockting v. Bayer, 02-15866
Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from convictions on charges associated with the alleged sexual abuse of petitioner's then-six-year-old step daughter is affirmed as a state court's decisions regarding the admissibility of the child victim's hearsay statements did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and were not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/13/2007
- Decided 09/27/2007
- Published 09/27/2007
Judges
- Before: J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, JOHN T. NOONAN, and M. MARGARET McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Franny A. Forsman, Federal Public Defender, Las Vegas, NV, for petitioner Marvin Howard Bockting.
- For Appellees:
- Victor-Hugo Schulze, II and Rene L. Hulse, Nevada State Attorney General's Office, for respondent Robert Bayer.