Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


Sherman v. US Parole Comm'n, 05-35364

An administrative warrant issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 4213(a) for the retaking of an alleged parole violator is not subject to the oath or affirmation requirement of the Fourth Amendment's Warrant Clause.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/09/2006
  • Decided 09/04/2007
  • Published 09/04/2007

Judges

  • BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:, Before:  MELVIN BRUNETTI, T.G. NELSON, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Christine Stebbins Dahl, Assistant Federal Defender, Portland, OR, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kenneth C. Bauman (brief), Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR;  and Kelly A. Zusman (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR, for the respondents-appellees.
Copied to clipboard