United States Ninth Circuit
Hoopai v. Astrue, 05-16128
A denial of an application for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act based on back pain and depression is affirmed where: 1) the district court correctly concluded that there was substantial evidence that claimant did not suffer from a sufficiently severe non-exertional limitation that would require the assistance of a vocational expert in the ALJ's step-five determination; 2) claimant was not entitled to question the ALJ on the available alternative jobs; and 3) the ALJ made specific findings of functional limitations as required by the social security regulations.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/19/2007
- Decided 08/27/2007
- Published 08/27/2007
Judges
- D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:, Before: D.W. NELSON and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Harvey P. Sackett of San Jose, CA, briefed and argued for the appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Sarah Ryan, Asst. Regional Counsel, Social Security Admin., San Franciso, CA, briefed and argued, Peter D. Keisler of San Francisco, CA, for the appellee.