United States Ninth Circuit
Hemmerle v. Schriro, 06-16601
Dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in determining the date upon which petitioner's direct appeal became final; 2) petitioner was not entitled to "gap tolling"; and 3) a state court decision terminating review began the AEDPA limitations period, not a later administrative mailing.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/14/2007
- Decided 07/19/2007
- Published 07/19/2007
Judges
- O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:, Before: CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael Bernays, Phoenix, AZ, argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant. He also filed an opening brief and a reply brief.
- For Appellees:
- Alan L. Amann, Assistant Attorney General of Arizona, Criminal Appeals Section, argued the cause for the respondent-appellee and filed a brief. Also on the brief were Terry Goddard, Attorney General of Arizona and Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel of the Arizona Criminal Appeals Section.