United States Ninth Circuit

A conviction for intentionally causing damage to a "protected computer" without authorization is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction; 2) any variance between the date in the indictment and the date of defendant's acts was immaterial; and 3) a refusal to appoint new counsel was appropriate.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/11/2007
• Published 07/11/2007

Judges

• HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:, Before:  CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Arthur Pirelli, San Rafael, CA, for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Amber S. Rosen, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, CA, for the appellee.