Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


Lewis v. Astrue, 04-17414

In an appeal arising from a denial of an application for supplementary security income and a finding that claimant was not disabled, summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner is affirmed where, even assuming that an ALJ erred in neglecting to list claimant's bursitis at Step 2, any error was harmless as it was discussed extensively at Step 4.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/17/2006
  • Decided 07/03/2007
  • Published 07/03/2007

Judges

  • WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:, Before:  J. CLIFFORD WALLACE and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Bess M. Brewer and Eugenie Denise Mitchell, Brewer & Mitchell, LLP, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael A. Cabotaje, Assistant Regional Counsel, U.S. Social Security Administration, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard