United States Ninth Circuit
Rogers v. County of San Joaquin, 05-16071
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging that the conduct of defendant-social worker in removing plaintiffs-children from their home without a warrant violated their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, summary judgment for social worker based on qualified immunity and denial of summary judgment to plaintiffs are reversed where: 1) it was clearly established that warrantless removal of children is permissible only in cases of exigency; and 2) it would have been apparent to a reasonable social worker that no exigency existed in the case at hand.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/16/2007
- Decided 05/29/2007
- Published 05/29/2007
Judges
- REINHARDT, Circuit Judge., Before: WARREN J. FERGUSON, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David J. Beauvais, Oakland, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel C. Cederborg, Office of the County Counsel, County of San Joaquin, Stockton, CA, for the defendants-appellees.