United States Ninth Circuit

Revocation of defendant's supervised release after he failed to make restitution payments required as a condition of supervised release for a 2003 bank fraud conviction is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke supervised release because he was arrested without a valid warrant; 2) he was denied a preliminary hearing in violation of Criminal Rule 32.1; 3) there was insufficient evidence to support the revocation; 4) some of the conditions of supervised release were improper; and 5) cumulative error entitles him to reversal.

Appellate Information

• Argued 04/18/2007
• Decided 05/24/2007
• Published 05/24/2007

Judges

• Before:  ALFRED T. GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON, and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Richard S. Kawana of Honolulu, HI, for defendant-appellant Arthur Jeremiah., Edward H. Kubo, Jr, United States Attorney, District of Hawaii;  Lawrence L. Tong, Assistant United States Attorney, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.