United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Sandoval-Mendoza, 04-10118
Trial courts may prohibit all communication between a defendant and his lawyer during a brief recess before or during cross-examination, but may not, under the Sixth Amendment, restrict communications during an overnight recess. A conviction for conspiracy to sell methamphetamine is reversed where the district court abused its discretion in excluding expert testimony about the defendant-s subnormal intelligence in the context of an entrapment defense.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/12/2005
- Decided 12/27/2006
- Published 12/27/2006
Judges
- KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge., Before ALFRED T. GOODWIN, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, and ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Marc J. Zilversmit, San Francisco, CA, for appellant Eduardo Sandoval-Mendoza.
- For Appellees:
- Erika R. Frick, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the appellee.