United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Stevens, 05-30597
In the context of child pornography and sentencing, a 2004 amendment to U.S.S.G. section 2G2.2(b)(2)(D) involving the definition of a "minor," was a substantive change rather than a clarification. Thus, a sentence for receipt of child pornography and possession of child pornography is vacated where the district court erred by retroactively applying the amended definition.
Appellate Information
- Argued 07/28/2006
- Decided 09/13/2006
- Published 09/13/2006
Judges
- GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:, Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Mark S. Werner, Federal Defenders of Montana, Billings, MT, for the defendant-appellant., Marcia Hurd, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for the plaintiff-appellee.