Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


Feibusch v. Integrated Device Tech., Inc. Employee Benefit Plan, 04-16501

In an ERISA action, a decision that an insurer, as issuer and administrator, did not abuse its discretion in terminating plaintiff's disability benefits is reversed where the district court: 1) did not apply the de novo standard of review, which was required since policy language did not merit deferential judicial review; and 2) did not correctly interpret the plan's provisions for termination of total disability.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 07/24/2006
  • Decided 09/07/2006
  • Published 09/07/2006

Judges

  • HUG, Circuit Judge., Before PROCTER HUG, JR., GILBERT STROUD MERRITT, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Mark D. DeBofsky, Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL;  Alan Van Etten & Robert D. Harris, Damon Key LeongKupchak Hastert, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Keith K. Hiraoka, Roeca Louie & Hiraoka, Honolulu, HI;  Mark E. Schmidtke, Schmidtke Hoeppner Consultants LLP, Valparaiso, IL, for the defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard