Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


Taylor v. Lewis, 04-17517

In a habeas case, it was not an unreasonable application of federal constitutional law for a California state court to decide that a "three strikes" sentence of 25 years to life for possessing 0.036 grams of cocaine did not violate the Eighth Amendment.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/13/2006
  • Decided 08/15/2006
  • Published 08/15/2006

Judges

  • Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Kevin G. Little, Fresno, CA, argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant.  Samya Burney, Fresno, CA, was on the brief.

  • For Appellees:
  • Justain P. Riley, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, argued the cause for the respondent-appellee, which filed no brief.   Respondent-appellee provided the notification required by Circuit Rule 31-2.3. The court granted permission to argue pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 31(c).
Copied to clipboard