United States Ninth Circuit
Taylor v. Lewis, 04-17517
In a habeas case, it was not an unreasonable application of federal constitutional law for a California state court to decide that a "three strikes" sentence of 25 years to life for possessing 0.036 grams of cocaine did not violate the Eighth Amendment.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/13/2006
- Decided 08/15/2006
- Published 08/15/2006
Judges
- Before GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kevin G. Little, Fresno, CA, argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant. Samya Burney, Fresno, CA, was on the brief.
- For Appellees:
- Justain P. Riley, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, argued the cause for the respondent-appellee, which filed no brief. Respondent-appellee provided the notification required by Circuit Rule 31-2.3. The court granted permission to argue pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 31(c).