United States Ninth Circuit
Dreiling v. Am. Express Co., 04-35715
Dismissal of a complaint claiming that defendant violated Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act by engaging in a short-swing trade in a company's stock as an insider, a "director by deputization," is reversed where, although the SEC had authority to adopt Rule 16b-3(d) and deference was owed to the SEC's interpretation of the rule, the Rule did not shield defendant from liability under Section 16(b).
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/03/2006
- Decided 08/14/2006
- Published 08/14/2006
Judges
- McKEOWN, Circuit Judge., Before STEPHEN REINHARDT, M. MARGARET McKEOWN, and RICHARD R. CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jonathan P. Meier and Richard E. Spoonemore, Sirianni Youtz Meier & Spoonemore, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant., Allan A. Capute, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae.
- For Appellees:
- Jason C. Vigna and Robert E. Zimet, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York, NY, for the defendant-appellee.