United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Espinoza-Cano, 05-10339
The proper standard for a district court-s review of a prosecutor-s decision not to file a motion for a reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines section 3E1.1(b) is the same standard for review of a decision to file a substantial assistance motion: the government may not refuse to file a motion on the basis of an unconstitutional motive or for reasons not rationally related to a legitimate government interest.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/07/2006
- Decided 08/08/2006
- Published 08/08/2006
Judges
- MILLER, District Judge:, Before: THOMPSON and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Josh Cohen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Robert David Rees, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.