United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Romm, 04-10648
Convictions for knowingly receiving and knowingly possessing child pornography are affirmed over claims that: 1) the evidence of his crime should have been suppressed as the fruits of an unlawful border search; 2) insufficient evidence supported the convictions; 3) a jury instruction was erroneously refused; and 4) there was plain error in instructing the jury. His sentences are vacated and remanded for resentencing in accordance with a stipulation reached by the parties.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/05/2005
- Decided 07/24/2006
- Published 07/24/2006
Judges
- BEA, Circuit Judge:, Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMPSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jason F. Carr, Las Vegas, NV, for appellant Stuart Romm.
- For Appellees:
- Nancy J. Koppe (briefed) and Daniel R. Schiess (argued), Las Vegas, NV, for appellee United States of America.