Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Ballesteros-Selinger, 05-50287

A conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation is affirmed where a memorandum of oral decision issued by an immigration judge was nontestimonial, and therefore its admission into evidence did not violate the Confrontation Clause.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/06/2006
  • Decided 07/19/2006
  • Published 07/19/2006

Judges

  • GOULD, Circuit Judge., Before SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAM W SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Jodi D. Thorp and Steven F. Hubachek, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Valerie H. Chu, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard