United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Ballesteros-Selinger, 05-50287
A conviction for illegal re-entry following deportation is affirmed where a memorandum of oral decision issued by an immigration judge was nontestimonial, and therefore its admission into evidence did not violate the Confrontation Clause.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/06/2006
- Decided 07/19/2006
- Published 07/19/2006
Judges
- GOULD, Circuit Judge., Before SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAM W SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Jodi D. Thorp and Steven F. Hubachek, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Valerie H. Chu, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.