United States Ninth Circuit
Boyd v. Newland, 03-17098
Denial of petitioner's habeas petition in a firearms-offense case is reversed in part where, in light of petitioner's plausible Batson claim, state appellate courts' denial of petitioner's request for a complete voir dire transcript and a full comparative analysis of the venire unreasonably applied clearly established federal law. (Amended opinion)
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/04/2004
- Decided 06/26/2006
- Published 06/26/2006
Judges
- Before: RICHARD D. CUDAHY,SUSAN P. GRABER, and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Mark E. Eibert, Half Moon Bay, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Glenn R. Pruden, Deputy Attorney General, State of California, San Francisco, CA, for the respondent-appellee.