United States Ninth Circuit

Grant of a motion to suppress evidence obtained by means of a wiretap of two cellular phones belonging to a defendant in a prosecution for drug-related offenses is affirmed where the wiretap evidence at issue had to be suppressed due to a facially insufficient application.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/13/2006
• Decided 06/26/2006
• Published 06/26/2006

Judges

• REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:, Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul K. Charlton, United States Attorney, John Joseph Tuchi, Deputy Appellate Chief, Keith E. Vercauteren, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Cameron A. Morgan, Scottsdale, AZ, for the appellees.