United States Ninth Circuit

Denial of defendant's motion for a new trial in a bank robbery case is affirmed over defendant's Brady claim and a claim that she was entitled to a new trial under the provisions of Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/22/2007
• Decided 06/26/2006
• Published 06/26/2006

Judges

• Before:  MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Circuit Judge, B. FLETCHER, HARRY PREGERSON, ALEX KOZINSKI, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER, BARRY G. SILVERMAN, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD, MARSHA S. BERZON, JAY S. BYBEE, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN, CARLOS T. BEA, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas M. Hoidal, Hoidal & Hannah, PLC, Phoenix, AZ, for the defendant-appellant., Michael T. Morrissey, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for the plaintiff-appellee.