Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. Miqbel, 05-10033

A sentence for violation of probation based upon drug-related offenses is vacated pursuant to a claim that the district court failed to explain the reasons for its departure from the recommended guidelines sentencing range with the required level of specificity.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/17/2005
  • Decided 04/17/2006
  • Published 04/17/2006

Judges

  • REINHARDT, Circuit Judge., Before STEPHEN REINHARDT and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and JANE A. RESTANI, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Quin Denvir, Federal Public Defender;  Timothy Zindel, Assistant Federal Public Defender (argued), Sacramento, CA, for the defendant-appellant., McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney;  Samantha S. Spangler, Assistant U.S. Attorney (argued), Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard