United States Ninth Circuit
Hale v. Norton, 03-36032
Denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order and dismissal of plaintiffs' case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is affirmed in a case challenging an agency's regulation of plaintiffs' use of a trail crossing federally protected land to access their property which was surrounded by the federal park at issue.
Appellate Information
- Argued 07/12/2005
- Decided 02/09/2006
- Published 02/09/2006
Judges
- Before ALFRED T. GOODWIN, MELVIN BRUNETTI, and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Russell C. Brooks and James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
- For Appellees:
- Matthew J. Sanders, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees., Robert W. Randall and Rebecca L. Bernard, Trustees for Alaska, Anchorage, AK, for the defendants-intervenors-appellees.