United States Ninth Circuit
Doe v. Rumsfeld, 05-15680
Denial of plaintiff-soldier's petition for writs of habeas corpus and mandamus is affirmed in a constitutional and statutory challenge to the President's "stop-loss" authority ordering plaintiff to active duty for a period longer than his enlistment.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/21/2005
- Decided 01/12/2006
- Published 01/12/2006
Judges
- TROTT, Circuit Judge., Before WALLACE, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Michael S. Sorgen, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- H. Thomas Byron III, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondents-appellees.