United States Ninth Circuit

Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review the subjective, discretionary determination that an alien failed to satisfy the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship requirement for cancellation of removal.

Appellate Information

• Argued 08/04/2005
• Decided 09/09/2005
• Published 09/09/2005

Judges

• WARDLAW, Circuit Judge., Before THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Nicholas Marchi, Carney & Marchi, P.S., Seattle, WA, for the petitioner.


• For Appellees:
  
• James A. McDevitt, United States Attorney, and William H. Beatty, Assistant United States Attorney, Spokane, WA, for the respondent.