United States Ninth Circuit
US v. Stewart, 03-10662
Defendant's conviction for threatening a federal judge is affirmed over his claim that 18 U.S.C. section 115(a)(1)(B) requires a defendant to communicate the threat directly to the intended target.
Appellate Information
- Argued 12/07/2004
- Decided 08/23/2005
- Published 08/23/2005
Judges
- BEA, Circuit Judge:, Before: O'SCANNLAIN, COWEN, and CBEA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas E. Haney, Esq., argued the cause for the appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Patrick Schneider, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for the appellee; Paul Charlton, Michael T. Morrissey, and Soo C. Song, Office of the U.S. Attorney, were also on the brief.