United States Ninth Circuit

Section 501 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 does not preempt California's per diem loan interest statute.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/04/2004
• Decided 08/12/2005
• Published 08/12/2005

Judges

• BERZON, Circuit Judge:, Before: REINHARDT, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Julie L. Williams, Acting Comptroller, Daniel P. Stipano, Acting Chief Counsel, L. Robert Griffin, Deputy Chief Counsel, and Horace G. Sneed, Director of Litigation, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Office of the Comptroller of the Currency., Edward P. Sangster and Dylan B. Carp, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae Quicken Loans Inc.


• For Appellees:
  
• Virginia Jo Dunlap, Deputy Commissioner, Alan S. Weinger, Supervising Counsel, Judy L. Hartley, Senior Corporations Counsel, Kimberly L. Gauthier, Corporations Counsel, and Douglas M. Gooding, Corporations Counsel, California Department of Corporations, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant/cross-appellee., William L. Stern, Severson & Werson, San Francisco, California, and E. Edward Bruce, Stuart C. Stock, Robert A. Long, Jr., and Keith A. Noreika, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants.