United States Ninth Circuit
Defenders of Wildlife v. Flowers, 03-16884
Defendant's determination that residential developments would have no effect on the Arizona pygmy-owl was not arbitrary and capricious.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/11/2005
- Decided 07/12/2005
- Published 07/12/2005
Judges
- Before: FERGUSON, NOONAN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Richard Rollman, Tucson, AZ, and Eric S. Merrifield, Seattle, WA, for amicus National Association of Home Builders.
- For Appellees:
- Michael Senatore, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-cross-appellants/appellees Defenders of Wildlife, et al., Todd Aagaard, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC, for the defendants-appellees., Norman D. James, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-intervenor-appellee/cross-appellant Grosvernor Holdings.