United States Ninth Circuit
Nagrampa v. MailCoups, Inc., 03-15955
An arbitrator, and not the court, is the proper party to determine whether an agreement containing an arbitration clause is unconscionable.
Appellate Information
- Decided 03/21/2005
- Published 03/21/2005
Judges
- Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, O'SCANNLAIN, THOMAS, GRABER, WARDLAW, FISHER, GOULD, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Kate Gordon & Leslie A. Bailey, Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, Oakland, CA; F. Paul Bland, Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, Washington, D.C.; Sanford M. Cipinko, Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Glenn J. Plattner and Christine S. Oh, Jenkens & Gilchrist, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee MailCoups, Inc., John S. Warnlof, Warnlof & Sumnick, Walnut Creek, CA; Shirley M. Hufstedler, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellee, American Arbitration Association.