Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


METROPCS, INC. v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 03-16759

Defendant-City's grant of plaintiff's application to construct a wireless telecommunications antenna is reversed where the decision unreasonably discriminated among providers of functionally equivalent services within the meaning of the Telecommunications Act.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/04/2004
  • Decided 03/07/2005
  • Published 03/07/2005

Judges

  • Before: CUDAHY,GRABER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James A. Heard, Mackenzie & Albritton LLP, San Francisco, CA;  Steven E. Grill, Devine, Millimet & Branch, P.A., Manchester, NH;  Scott J. Grossberg and Javan N. Rad, Cihigoyenetche, Grossberg & Clouse, Rancho Cucamonga, CA;  Paul J. Lawrence, Preston Gates & Ellis LLP, Seattle, WA;  and Daniel Pascucci, Fish & Richardson, P.C., San Diego, CA, and Paul L. Weisbecker, Litigation Counsel, Cingular Wireless LLC, Atlanta, GA, for the amici curiae.

  • For Appellees:
  • Martin L. Fineman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee., William K. Sanders, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.
Copied to clipboard