United States Ninth Circuit

Defendant's drug conviction is affirmed over his claims that 1)the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress statements, 2)the district court erred in permitting certain expert opinion testimony, and 3)the prosecutors engaged in prejudicial misconduct.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/12/2005
• Decided 03/01/2005
• Published 03/01/2005

Judges

• ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge., Before:  NOONAN, CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Daniel P. Blank, Office of the Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Kevin V. Ryan, United States Attorney, Hannah Horsley and Susan R. Jerich, Assistant United States Attorneys, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.