Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


ANDERSON v. ALAMEIDA, 04-15751

Denial of plaintiff's habeas corpus writ is affirmed over his challenge that his trial attorney's failure to argue for the exclusion of his car-ride confession was a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/12/2005
  • Decided 02/02/2005
  • Published 02/02/2005

Judges

  • Before NOONAN, CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Lawrence A. Gibbs, Law Office of Lawrence A. Gibbs, Berkeley, CA, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dane R. Gillette, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for the respondent-appellee.
Copied to clipboard