Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. RAMIREZ-ROBLES, 03-30122

Defendant's drug convictions are affirmed over his challenges that there was insufficient evidence to convict him, that the district court erred by admitting prior bad act evidence, and that the district court erred by excluding polygraph evidence.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/02/2004
  • Decided 10/21/2004
  • Published 10/21/2004

Judges

  • HUG, Circuit Judge., Before:  HUG, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Richard L. Fredericks, Eugene, OR, for the defendant-appellant., Douglas W. Fong, Assistant United States Attorney, Medford, OR, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard