United States Ninth Circuit
RODRIGUEZ v. ANSETT AUSTRALIA LTD., 02-56473
Summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where neither a plaintiff's development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or defendant-airline's failure to warn of the risks of developing DVT during air travel constitutes an accident for purposes of the Warsaw Convention.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/07/2004
- Decided 09/03/2004
- Published 09/03/2004
Judges
- TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:, Before: THOMAS G. NELSON, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Clay Robbins III, Magaña, Cathcart & McCarthy, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Roderick D. Margo, Condon & Forsyth LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-appellees.