United States Ninth Circuit

A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on her claim of retaliation is affirmed where municipal liability could be imposed on defendants since they were final policymakers of employee discipline policy and sufficient evidence was present to show that plaintiff was retaliated against.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/09/2004
• Decided 09/01/2004
• Published 09/01/2004

Judges

• WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:, Before ALARCÓN, BEEZER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Scott Abbott, Carol Davis Zucker, Edwin A. Keller, Kamer, Zucker & Abbott, Las Vegas, NV, Kathy M. Banke (Argued), Reed, Smith, Crosby, Heafey, Oakland, CA, for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robert D. Vannah (Argued), Vannah & Costello, Las Vegas, NV, Richard Segerblom, Adam Ganz, Las Vegas, NV, for the appellee.