United States Ninth Circuit

Summary judgment against defendant is reversed as the district court erred by misinterpreting the language of an insurance policy, which contained additional terms indicating an intent to extend broader coverage, and, as a result, provided coverage not only for actual collapse, but also for imminent collapse.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/07/2004
• Decided 08/05/2004
• Published 08/05/2004

Judges

• BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:, Before: BRUNETTI, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• John T. Petrie, Esq., Seattle, WA, for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Jerret E. Sale, Esq., Seattle, WA, for the appellee.