Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. GUDINO, 03-30023

Defendant's motion to suppress his identity, disclosed as a result of an unconstitutional stop, was denied because the simple fact of who a defendant is cannot be excluded, regardless of the nature of the violation leading to his identity.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/02/2003
  • Decided 07/22/2004
  • Published 07/22/2004

Judges

  • KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge., Before KLEINFELD, GOULD, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Anthony R. Gallagher, Federal Defender, Great Falls, MT, for the appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Carl E. Rostad (argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, and David G. Dennis (briefed), Assistant U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for the appellee.
Copied to clipboard