Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


GADDA v. ASHCROFT, 02-15113

Plaintiff challenges his suspension from the Board of Immigration Appeals based on his suspension by the California State Bar Court, claiming that the suspension is invalid because the Supreme Court of California lacked jurisdiction; however, the Court decided that federal law does not preempt the Supreme Court of California's authority to suspend or disbar attorneys in California and both suspensions should stand.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/20/2004
  • Published 07/20/2004

Judges

  • Before BEEZER, THOMAS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Miguel D. Gadda, Esq., San Francisco, CA, pro se, for the petitioner-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Jocelyn Burton, Esq. and Robert Yeargin, Esq., Assistant United States Attorneys, San Francisco, CA, and David J. Kline, Esq. and Hugh G. Mullane, Esq., United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondents-appellees John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General, and Board of Immigration Appeals.
Copied to clipboard