United States Ninth Circuit

Evidence seized from hotel room was admissible, because defendant had obtained the room through fraudulent use of a stolen credit card, and therefore had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the room.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/29/2004
• Decided 06/14/2004
• Published 06/14/2004

Judges

• TROTT, Circuit Judge:, Before: HALL, TROTT, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• William S. Harris, Law Offices of William S. Harris, South Pasadena, CA, for the defendant-appellant., Pegeen D. Rhyne, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.