United States Ninth Circuit
US v. DHINGRA, 03-10001
Court failed to find 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b) (using the internet to solicit sexual activity from a minor) facially unconstitutional as overbroad, vague, or violative of the First or Tenth Amendments for incorporating state criminal sex offense statues.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/12/2004
- Decided 06/08/2004
- Published 06/08/2004
Judges
- McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:, Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and MMcKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- William Weiner, San Francisco, CA, for the appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Kevin V. Ryan, United States Attorney, Hannah Horsley, Assistant United States Attorney, and Brian J. Stretch, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the appellee.