Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. DHINGRA, 03-10001

Court failed to find 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b) (using the internet to solicit sexual activity from a minor) facially unconstitutional as overbroad, vague, or violative of the First or Tenth Amendments for incorporating state criminal sex offense statues.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/12/2004
  • Decided 06/08/2004
  • Published 06/08/2004

Judges

  • McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:, Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and MMcKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William Weiner, San Francisco, CA, for the appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kevin V. Ryan, United States Attorney, Hannah Horsley, Assistant United States Attorney, and Brian J. Stretch, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the appellee.
Copied to clipboard