Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


US v. PRIME, 02-30375

Admission of expert handwriting analysis testimony was not an abuse of discretion; denial of two motions to substitute counsel on the eve of trial was not an abuse of discretion; jury exposure to extrinsic evidence had no impact on the verdict.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/04/2004
  • Decided 04/16/2004
  • Published 04/16/2004

Judges

  • TROTT, Circuit Judge:, Before:  TROTT, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Anna M. Tolin,Siderius Lonergan & Martin, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant., Michael T. Sennott, Siderius Lonergan & Martin, Seattle, WA, for the defendant-appellant., Bruce F. Miyake, Assistant United States Attorney, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Copied to clipboard