United States Ninth Circuit

Habeas relief granted where the California Court of Appeals' decision that the prosecutor did not engage in purposeful discrimination during jury selection represents (1) an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented at trial, and (2) an objectively unreasonable application of clearly established law. (Amended opinion)

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/05/2003
• Decided 11/07/2003
• Published 04/08/2004

Judges

• Before:  HALL, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Karyn H. Bucur, Laguna Hills, CA, argued the case for the appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Erika D. Jackson, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, argued the case for the appellees.